Ridiculing Conspiracy Theorists

Dear Editor

I got a kick out of your editorial entitled “Blown Away Blueways – When Conspiracies Flood the Land”.  After disparaging “conspiracy theorists” as “tin-foil hats”, you cite several instances in which they were ultimately vindicated: Benghazi, the IRS scandal, Operation Fast and Furious, and “If you like your health plan, you can keep it”.  If the mainstream media would do its job of investigative journalism instead of reporting as news the story line of whoever happens to be in power, the gap between what most people believe and the news headlines would not be so great.  

By the way, John F. Kennedy stated:  “For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.  It is a system that has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations”. 

So which is it – 1) this is all baloney and JFK is a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist, 2) you truly are oblivious to this, or 3) you are part of the game?

Secondly, I was interested in your editorial: “Change: It happens”, about the military changing rules about hair length and head coverings.  While your insights were useful about the changing times, you IGNORE the greatest story impacting our U.S. military – Obama firing over 250 of our top military leaders.  Just google that topic, and you will see a lot of articles, or you can take a look at these articles:



This is huge, and you would rather write about hair length and head coverings!  This brings me back to the question stated above – are you oblivious to this, or are you part of the game?

Best regards,

%d bloggers like this: